In my previous articles, you may have noticed how often I used these pseudo-elements. Why I like to use them? Because they are so handy to use as no extra HTML markup is required, but this article’s purpose isn’t about pseudo-elements advantages.
This article’s purpose is to clarify some common misunderstandings regarding the above pseudo-elements syntax.
The pseudo-elements are so-called because they are not real HTML elements. For example, there are no HTML tags called before or after, but using CSS you can apply styles to a certain element using
Single/double colon syntax
There is absolutely no difference between
::before, or between
::after. Using double colon for pseudo-elements is “da new thang”, the CSS3 way.
This :: notation is introduced by the current document in order to establish a discrimination between pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements. For compatibility with existing style sheets, user agents must also accept the previous one-colon notation for pseudo-elements introduced in CSS levels 1 and 2 (namely, :first-line, :first-letter, :before and :after).
Find more at: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#pseudo-elements
Internet Explorer 7 and lower do not support the above pseudo-elements. But, the surprise is that IE8 does and I’d say that’s a very good (also the only) reason to use the single colon syntax.
Please note that this discution, to use single-colon (:) or double-colon (::), is valid only when talking about pseudo-elements. Pseudo-classes are left out of discussion.
How do you use pseudo-elements?
Single-colon or double-colon? Leave a comment and share with us your opinion!
Posted by: Dhiraj kumar